dustboy
***
Take a look at the new EVgo plans, they seem to have ditched the session fees. My charging just got a lot cheaper.
The old Flex plan was $10.95 for a 30 minute session and you had to pay the session fee again to start the charger again. Even after they raise the per minute price to $0.35/minute, you will still only pay $10.50 for the same 30 minutes. To me, the biggest benefit is that you can charge for only 10 or 15 minutes for a reasonable price without the session fee. So, to me it's a win-win. In addition, they have moved the auto-shutoff to 45 minutes instead of 30 minutes if you're on the new plans.2016golfse said:Cheaper depends on the situation. I'm on pay-as-you-go, which is $4.95 per session + 20 cents per minute for that "just in case" scenario. Under the new rate plan, I'm assuming that after the introductory offer, they'll charge 35 cents a minute in California. At any charge session longer than 33 minutes, the new rate plan will actually cost more than the old pay-as-you-go.
2016golfse said:Cheaper depends on the situation. I'm on pay-as-you-go, which is $4.95 per session + 20 cents per minute for that "just in case" scenario. Under the new rate plan, I'm assuming that after the introductory offer, they'll charge 35 cents a minute in California. At any charge session longer than 33 minutes, the new rate plan will actually cost more than the old pay-as-you-go.
The Flex plan was a session fee plus $0.20/minute. The current promotion in California is also $0.20/minute with no session fee, so no matter how long, paying any session fee is more expensive. Of course, when the price goes up, there would be some session length that could be cheaper. If the price is $0.25/minute, it would take 100 minutes of charging with a $0.05 margin to make up the $4.95 session fee. If the price is $0.35/minute, it would take only 33 minutes with a $0.15 margin to make up the session fee.2016golfse said:If the session on the old Flex plan has increased to 45-60 minutes (which I don't know if that's the case or not), then wouldn't the old Flex plan be cheaper for any session longer than 33 minutes?
Exactly. For me being able to cost-effectively charge for a short time (and not have to do the math on how long I have to charge to make it "worth it") more than makes up for the potentially higher cost of longer sessions.miimura said:Getting rid of the session fee encourages people to only use the equipment for only the time that they really need. I used to feel like I had to charge for the full 30 minutes to get my money's worth