jand8595 said:Any info on when a DC fast charging upgrade will be available for the 2016 eGolf SE?
bizzle said:my understanding is it'll be an option from the factory but not available as an upgrade after purchase.
miimura said:There is no way the Charging Package will be retro-fittable. Especially for that price. The parts price on the on-board charger alone will be more than the package price. The charging inlet and HVDC cable all the way back to the battery junction point will be another $650-$1,000.
I really hate that VW went this route to hit their price point on the SE. sirshan is clearly not the only one who didn't understand the limitations of the SE. They should stayed with other cosmetic things like the steel wheels on the LE.
miimura said:I really hate that VW went this route to hit their price point on the SE. sirshan is clearly not the only one who didn't understand the limitations of the SE. They should stayed with other cosmetic things like the steel wheels on the LE.
johnnylingo said:miimura said:I really hate that VW went this route to hit their price point on the SE. sirshan is clearly not the only one who didn't understand the limitations of the SE. They should stayed with other cosmetic things like the steel wheels on the LE.
In fairness, they're competing with the Focus and Leaf S, both of which have ~ 3 kW chargers and don't do fast charging either. I think the problem is more on the education: customers are confusing the 2015 LE with the 2016 SE not realizing there's a reason for the $4000 MSRP difference. The sales people should be pointing this out, and are not.
If they do go start offering an upgraded charger on the SE it will almost certainly be to compete with the Kia Soul EV-e, which lacks the bells and whistles of the higher trims but has the same 6.6 kW charger. The MSRP for the EV-E is about $32,000 so I wouldn't be surprised if VW eats some cost in order to match that price point.
bizzle said:notice that the guys that are happy about their fast charging SEL's, who got great pricing on their vehicles, also purchased last year's models and say they don't really care about the radio. Their payments are much, much higher than yours and they're stuck with a headunit that other people regularly say they hate with a passion (a feature that is worthless to someone who doesn't use the radio). .
The Leaf has aftermarket options to upgrade their 3.6KwH charging systems. You have to search some DIY forums to read about them to get a sense of the cost and difficulty. It's not impossible.sirshan said:...dont get me wrong guys. DC Charging would have been a "nice to have"...
Still getting the JuiceBox Pro 40 to somewhat future proof the charging needs. Im sure it will increase as time passes on. At least we have an answer for the folks wondering if they can retro fit an upgrade. Thats a negative at this point unless some aftermarket company finds a way to do it for us with the 3.6kw charging systems onboard already.
bizzle said:they're stuck with a headunit that other people regularly say they hate with a passion (a feature that is worthless to someone who doesn't use the radio).
Well said. The interest charges over the life of my lease amount to $900. That $900 premium entitles me to wash my hands of the car if it proves to be problematic (see: early Leafs). If I still like the car in 3 years, I can buy it with the future value of the money I did not spend on the car up front.bizzle said:As for buying vs. financing. Edge case examples of people dropping 25K at a dealership to purchase a car outright are not valuable data points for the rest of the public. Most people do not purchase their vehicles outright, whether they have enough money to do so in their bank accounts. I *also* was raised not to purchase things on credit that I can't afford, so JoulesThief is not a special snowflake in that regard, but I was also raised to make wise financial decisions and my current credit status allows me the freedom to invest that money for a higher return rather than locking it into a depreciating asset.
Huh? Why would everyone want it "then" when we don't want it now? False assumption. Some of us could care less about it, not "all" of us, or "everyone". Speak only for yourself, not for everyone else, that's far too broad a brush to be painting with here. I'd keep the $2000. I am in to my e-golf SEL for such a good price, it's a non issue what it is worth in 4 or 5 years... a non issue. Consider it the cost of going CO2 free, it's a sunken cost. I'd like to see drivers more focused on driving here in Los Angeles, instead of mindless and zoning out, listening to music, or getting irate at talk radio hosts or guests. Driving is an occupation and a heavy responsibility. Distractions like screaming kids in the car and music make it more dangerous for the operator to stay focused on the task at hand.johnnylingo said:bizzle said:they're stuck with a headunit that other people regularly say they hate with a passion (a feature that is worthless to someone who doesn't use the radio).
This is a real good point. Looking down the road a few years I think everyone will either have or want CarPlay and Android Auto. This the reason I decided to wait for a 2016. I was not keen on getting a "brand new" car and then spending $2,000 to upgrade the headunit, if it was even possible at all.
Enter your email address to join: