NeilBlanchard
***
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
- Messages
- 298
Verkehr said:I don't disagree. Let me restate that I was referring only to "going down hills where coasting will result in higher average speed" e.g. any steep hill since one obviously can't alter the topography with their driving style.NeilBlanchard said:Verkehr said:Regen is better than coasting for recovering potential energy (going down hills) where coasting will result in higher average speed and more aero losses, though.
It all depends on what you need to do: if you want to carry speed (and you can) then coasting is best. Regen should only be used when you need to slow down.
Coasting has the lowest loss possible - and uses the kinetic energy to move the car forward. Regen can never regain all the energy (by definition) so it is better than friction brakes - but it cannot substitute for coasting.
Aero losses will always happen, so that is a red herring.
The other aspect of coasting is that you accelerate less - so you use significantly less energy, and then use the kinetic energy you have "invested" in the moving car in the best way possible. In B mode, you accelerate and then regen, so you use more energy, then lose more.
I thought of another real world coasting-buster scenario: no traffic, travelling 55 mph, light turns red 1/8 mile up the road (or whatever particular distance a 55 mph e-golf would coast for). It's a long light... coasting all the way up without touching the brake is less efficient than regen braking hard and then travelling at a slow rate (~15 mph) before coasting to a stop; every moment spent at higher speed is more kJ being used to heat the air. Regen losses are quickly overcome with less energy lost in the air. Just a way of lowering average speed with little effect on travel time.
Right - WHEN you need to slow down, regen is great! There is regen integrated on the brake pedal in the e-Golf, which makes this really easy, and you can fine tune how much you slow down.
I only use the D1, D2, etc. for really extended downhills.